Make Security Everyone's Job
The best security tools in the world can't compensate for developers who don't know what an injection vulnerability looks like — or a culture where security is 'someone else's problem.'
You might be experiencing...
Security training Canada programmes fail when they’re a checkbox exercise — a mandatory annual video that developers skip through to get the completion certificate. Real security culture change requires relevant, hands-on training that connects to the code your team actually writes.
The Developer Security Knowledge Gap
Most software engineering programmes don’t teach security. Developers learn to build features, not to anticipate how attackers will abuse them. The result: the same vulnerability classes that have been on the OWASP Top 10 for two decades — injection, broken authentication, sensitive data exposure — continue to appear in Canadian codebases because developers don’t know what to look for.
Developer security training Toronto closes this gap with workshops that use your team’s actual tech stack, real-world vulnerability examples, and hands-on exercises that build pattern recognition. A developer who has exploited an SQL injection vulnerability in a workshop is far less likely to introduce one in production code.
Threat Modeling as Design Practice
Security shouldn’t be an afterthought — it should be a design input. Threat modeling (using frameworks like STRIDE or PASTA) identifies potential attack vectors during the design phase, when architectural changes are cheap. During implementation, they’re expensive. After deployment, they’re very expensive.
We run threat modeling workshops using one of your actual services as the subject. Your architects and senior developers learn the methodology by applying it to a system they understand — not a textbook example. The output is a reusable process they can apply to every new feature and service.
Security Champions Programme
Sustainable security culture requires advocates in every team. Our security champions programme identifies one developer per team who receives advanced security training and serves as the team’s security liaison. Champions review PRs with a security lens, participate in threat modeling sessions, and escalate security concerns to the security team.
Beyond Development: Phishing and Social Engineering
Technical controls fail when humans click malicious links. Our phishing simulation programme tests your team’s resilience with realistic campaigns, provides immediate training to those who click, and tracks improvement over time.
Book a free 30-minute consultation to assess your team’s security culture and design a training programme. Contact us.
Engagement Phases
Security Culture Assessment
Assess current security awareness across engineering and operations teams. Review existing training programmes, measure baseline knowledge (OWASP Top 10, secure coding practices), and identify the highest-risk knowledge gaps.
Training Programme Design
Design role-specific training tracks: developers (secure coding, OWASP Top 10, code review), architects (threat modeling, security design patterns), operations (incident response, access management). Include hands-on exercises with real-world vulnerability examples.
Workshop Delivery
Deliver interactive workshops: OWASP Top 10 deep-dive with code examples in your tech stack, threat modeling workshop using STRIDE methodology on one of your actual services, secure code review workshop with PR-based exercises.
Ongoing Reinforcement
Establish security champions programme (one developer per team as security liaison), configure monthly security challenges, set up secure code review checklists integrated into PR templates, and schedule quarterly refresher sessions.
Deliverables
Before & After
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| OWASP Top 10 knowledge | < 30% of developers can identify common vulnerability classes | 90%+ can identify and remediate OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities |
| Phishing success rate | 20%+ of employees click simulated phishing links | < 5% click rate after training and ongoing simulation |
| Security-aware code reviews | Code reviews focus only on functionality and style | Security checklist integrated into every PR review |
Tools We Use
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does security culture change take?
Initial workshops create awareness in 2-4 weeks. Behavioural change — developers consistently writing secure code, conducting threat models, and catching vulnerabilities in code review — typically takes 3-6 months of reinforcement. The security champions programme accelerates this by embedding security advocates in each team.
What if our developers are in different locations across Canada?
All our training is available remotely via interactive virtual workshops. For teams in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, Calgary, and Ottawa, we also offer in-person workshops. The hands-on exercises and threat modeling sessions work equally well in both formats.
How is this different from off-the-shelf security training?
Off-the-shelf training uses generic examples in Java or C#. Our workshops use code examples from your actual tech stack, threat models of your actual services, and vulnerability scenarios relevant to your industry. A fintech developer learning about authentication bypass sees examples relevant to payment systems, not generic login forms.
Get Started for Free
Schedule a free consultation. 30-minute call, actionable results in days.
Talk to an Expert